Enhance your CompTIA CASP+ exam readiness with our comprehensive quizzes. Sharpen your skills with detailed flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and in-depth explanations. Prepare effectively for this challenging exam!

Practice this question and more.


In a merger between two companies with different IT strategies, what approach assists in resolving disagreements on system deployment?

  1. Calculate costs and time to deploy in-sourced systems

  2. Prioritize company culture over IT needs

  3. Mandate one system type for both companies

  4. Outsource all new IT implementations

The correct answer is: Calculate costs and time to deploy in-sourced systems

Calculating the costs and time to deploy in-sourced systems provides a clear and objective framework for decision-making when merging disparate IT strategies. This approach facilitates discussions based on quantitative data rather than subjective opinions or preferences. By outlining the potential costs involved and estimating the time required for deployment, stakeholders can better understand the implications of their choices, which helps to bridge the gap between differing IT philosophies. This method allows for a more structured discussion, enabling both companies to come to a consensus that is financially and strategically sound. It emphasizes transparency and accountability, which are critical in a merger scenario where aligning different operational strategies is essential for success. When faced with the challenge of integrating systems, leveraging a data-driven approach helps ensure that decisions are made logically and based on the best interests of both organizations. Other approaches may overlook key considerations in a merger context. Prioritizing company culture over IT needs might lead to decisions that aren't sustainable or relevant to operational efficiency. Mandating a single system type could alienate stakeholders from one company or the other and could result in resistance to change. Outsourcing all new IT implementations may complicate ownership, accountability, and the integration of technology within the newly formed organization, further complicating the merger's success. Thus, the calculated evaluation of costs