CompTIA CASP+ Practice Test

What security concern arises from a wireless vendor supporting only a pre-ratification version of a standard?

1. Lack of compatibility with future updates.

2. Increased risk of security breaches.

3. Vendor reliability may be questioned.

4. Delay in implementation of the wireless solution.

The correct answer is: Lack of compatibility with future updates.

The focus on the lack of compatibility with future updates is significant when a vendor supports only a pre-ratification version of a wireless standard. A pre-ratification standard indicates that the technology is in a state of flux, and it may not have been fully vetted or finalized. This leads to concerns about compatibility with future enhancements and updates, as the final version may introduce new features, protocols, or security measures that the pre-ratification version does not support. This lack of alignment with the newest standards could hinder the integration of new technology and prevent the implementation of effective security measures that come with the finalized version. Organizations rely on standards to ensure interoperability and security; thus, using a pre-ratification version can lead to challenges in smoothly upgrading systems and ensuring that devices can communicate securely and effectively as the standards evolve. In contrast, the other options relate to different aspects of the technology and its deployment but do not directly address the primary concern with relying on an unsupported or obsolete standard version.