CompTIA CASP+ Practice Test

What type of access control might be inadequate in environments with high-security needs such as government sites?

1. Proximity readers

2. Security guards

3. Electronic door locks

4. Traditional keys

The correct answer is: Traditional keys

Traditional keys may be inadequate in high-security environments like government sites due to several reasons related to their nature and functionality. Firstly, traditional keys can be easily duplicated without authorization, which poses a security risk in sensitive locations. In contrast, more advanced access control methods provide better tracking and accountability. For example, electronic locks typically offer the ability to restrict access to specific individuals while maintaining logs of who accesses what areas and when, which is critical for security auditing. Additionally, traditional keys lack the capability for immediate revocation of access. If an employee loses their key or an unauthorized person gains possession of it, the security protocols would require a time-consuming process of changing locks to ensure safety. On the other hand, electronic access control systems can be updated instantly to remove access for users, thereby maintaining the integrity of the security environment. Moreover, in high-security settings, it’s essential to integrate multiple layers of access control, often referred to as defense in depth. Systems that rely on physical keys alone do not provide the flexibility and enhanced security features that integrated systems, such as biometrics or card readers, offer. Overall, for environments with high-security needs, relying solely on traditional keys can lead to vulnerabilities and does not meet the stringent requirements for access control that such