CompTIA CASP+ Practice Test

Which methodology should be followed for compiling evidence during an internal investigation?

1. Ad hoc collection and analysis

2. Forensic and structured approach

3. Collaborative external audits

4. Random sampling of data

The correct answer is: Forensic and structured approach

The forensic and structured approach is essential for compiling evidence during an internal investigation because it ensures that the evidence is collected, preserved, and analyzed in a manner that maintains its integrity and reliability. This methodology involves following established protocols and procedures, which aids in ensuring the evidence is admissible in any potential legal proceedings. A forensic approach typically entails using specialized tools and techniques to gather digital evidence, thus providing a comprehensive examination of the circumstances surrounding the investigation. It emphasizes careful documentation and chain of custody, which are critical components in validating the authenticity and credibility of the evidence collected. Moreover, a structured approach helps organize the investigation process, making it easier to identify relevant findings and conclusions. It supports a thorough analysis that takes into account both the technical aspects and the contextual factors of the investigation, enabling a clearer understanding of what occurred and why. In contrast to this approach, options like ad hoc collection and analysis or random sampling of data can lead to incomplete or biased datasets, which may not yield conclusive or legally defensible results. Collaborative external audits, while useful in certain contexts, may not be practical or relevant when dealing with internal matters that require a close inspection and understanding of internal processes and data.